
No one will get it at first, just as no one will get me at first. But once you know what it is, you'll know a lot more about me than my own picture could tell you.

What is it? An astronomical computer using a sophisticated system of exquisitely crafted gears to calculate the relative positions of the sun, moon, planets, and constellations at any time of the year, even indicating lunar phase, with a set of cranks and dials.

Cicero had actually seen another machine Posidonius had built, an armillary sphere, which is another mechanical computer, though instead of employing cranks and dial readouts, an armillary actually represents the sun, moon, and planets as balls on rotating rings around the central earth in three dimensions, like an actual model of the solar system. To build such a machine required estimating the relative distances of the planetary bodies, which could only be done by fanciful conjecture for the planets, but was more or less within the means of the time to calculate for the sun and moon.
It was probably to that end that Posidonius employed astronomical science to calculate those distances. Using geometry and astronomical data he estimated the sun to be roughly 57 million miles from the earth, a figure more than half the true distance, far more accurate than any other astronomer’s estimate in antiquity. He also calculated the sun was about 343,000 miles in diameter, which is nearly half the true solar diameter of 870,000 miles, a value also unrivaled until modern times. Posidonius’ calculation of the moon's distance came to roughly 229,000 miles, which is essentially correct. And he worked out that the circumference of the earth fell between 27,500 and 20,500 miles, for an average of about 24,000 miles, which is very close the correct value of about 25,000 miles. These are incredible achievements, and would not be improved upon until more modern times.

There is a sad ending to the story.

Back to the point. Why use an x-ray of the Antikythera computer as my avatar? For many reasons. In the least important sense, it is a metaphor for the many great achievements of the Greeks and Romans drowned into oblivion under the tenure of the Christian Church. Though this shipwreck has nothing to do with that, the fact that no writings about this machine were preserved, nor anything written by Posidonius, has a lot to do with it. Hence the fact that we have to peer into the muck and crust with x-ray machines to discover the truth of our pre-Christian past is somewhat symbolic of the dangers of religious zealotry.
But more importantly, I chose this because it is an astonishing symbol of the incredible genius of humankind, a pursuit of reason and excellence that I fight for and embrace. Not only is the machine itself fantastically ingenious, but so is the work done by modern engineers to reconstruct and recover its technology from scattered and ruined scraps. The very invention of the x-ray camera, and then its improvement to generate computerized axial tomography (used now on the Antikythera debris), is yet another symbol of humanity's admirable achievements. This is what I am about. Technology, ingenuity, explanation and mastery of the world through reason.
Yet more because the Antikythera Machine represents the amazing scientific, astronomical, and technological achievements of the Greeks and Romans in particular, which have all captured my mind and my career. I am continuously amazed at what I learn, not only about what the ancients achieved and knew, but also how difficult and complex the questions they answered were. They ventured smartly into planetary theory, the laws of mechanics, optics, and acoustics, even neurophysiology. And though never mass produced or ubiquitously available, they nevertheless had all manner of technologies, from vending machines and mechanized harvesters to automatic doors and electroshock therapy. The Antikythera computer is perhaps the most amazing of all. If you want to know what fascinates me, this is it.
But even more I chose it because this discovery shattered all the assumptions of historians of science about the cultural and social context of ancient science and technology, refuting in one blow a widespread belief that ancient scientists did not work closely with ancient craftsmen, or endeavor to achieve technological advances, or respect any physical work of the hands. It reminds me of how easily historians can get things wrong, and how important careful historical methodology is. This find is an especially good example of how the archaeological record repeatedly proves there were things going on in the ancient world that our surviving literary texts don't mention, demonstrating the dangers of arguments from silence, which have been all too common in the history of science. Careful historical methodology, getting right the history of ancient science, these are things I am very much about.
But above all, I chose it because this picture represents my interests as a historian: ancient science and intellectual achievements, especially in the Roman era; and also my interests as a philosopher: science, mechanism, and the empirical application of reason.

My next book, which should be out in a few years, will have a lot more to say about ancient science (including Posidonius and the Antikythera Machine). But tomorrow I'll post something on the subject that has come up recently on the internet.
12 comments:
Cool concept for your avatar. I tried to guess what it was before reading your post. I thought it was an x-ray (correct) of a hominid skull (D'Oh!).
So good to see you with an official residence in the blogosphere! The Antikythera Machine is a perfect icon for you. What an amazing story. I can't wait to read more from you on Posidonius and all things Carrieresque. Go Rick go!
It reads like a science fiction story: The recovery of the ruins of a piece of technology that seems way too advanced for its historical context. Kind of reminds me of the reconstruction of the Archimedes palimpest, in fact -- another glimpse into the intellectual potentials of pagan antiquity that the christians helped to destroy.
Thought it was an xray of a harddisk. I guess I was pretty close thematically but way off temporally. ;)
/Z
I'll be adding you to the blogroll. Looking forward to reading more...
Hey you don't look anything like I pictured you. No horns or anything. Um, you do have a cloven hoof, right? (Just kidding).
Nice blog, interesting. I'm going to link to it, even though you are, you know, the enemy camp and all. ;-)
SFGate must be reading your blog ... they have a cover story today about the Antikythera Mechanism.
you are out of touch wiht the whole field of history of science. You only mention two names and not major names, what about Jacob? Westfall? Numbers? There are many others. Going back to classics Buttfield, Burtt,Wylie.
J.L. Hinman said... you are out of touch wiht the whole field of history of science. You only mention two names and not major names, what about Jacob? Westfall? Numbers? There are many others. Going back to classics Buttfield, Burtt,Wylie.
What do those guys have to do with what I'm talking about in this post? What "two names and not major names" do I "mention"? I haven't a clue what you are on about. Are you sure you didn't post this here by accident?
And why can't you spellcheck your comments?
My next book, which should be out in a few years, will have a lot more to say about ancient science (including Posidonius and the Antikythera Machine).
Have you already written this book? Is it available?
Alexander said... Have you already written this book?
I have, but it isn't complete (I have a stack of notes and articles that must be vetted to correct dozens of uncertainties and minor errors in my manuscript, and tons of new stuff has just come out I must review to include). Hence the answer to your second question is no, it's not available.
Because I am obligated to complete On the Historicity of Jesus Christ first, I've shelved The Scientist in the Early Roman Empire for now. But it will be the first thing I finish after OHJC is done (apart from perhaps some chapters I'm already contracted to do for a coming anthology).
I'll be blogging soon (hopefully) the status of OHJC, but in short, half of it is done, and I am shopping a publisher for that half now (i.e. I'll be publishing the whole in two volumes, and the first is ready to publish, it just hasn't landed a publisher yet). I hope to complete the second half before year's end. That leaves SERE for 2011.
Well, I'm looking forward to reading your book soon!
Post a Comment